This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

>> 
>> So you want to have two copies of the demangler?  Or how do you
>> propose to get the demangler into libstdc++?
>
> There are always 2 C++ demanglers. One is in libiberty and the other
> is in libstdc++.

There's always going to be two copies of the object, since it is
expected to appear in both libraries.  I'm talking about the source
code.  Are there two copies of the source code?  If there are, explain
how you propose to guarantee that they are kept in sync.  If there are
not, explain how you get the object file included in both libiberty
and libstdc++ without introducing circular build dependencies.

zw
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]