This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Re: What happens with attribute((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:26:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?
References: <m3llvyma98.fsf@frogsleap.quesejoda.com> <F75CA570-A25F-11D7-922B-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <m3d6ham9ie.fsf_-_@frogsleap.quesejoda.com> <87smq6dmi8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

> This seems like the obvious right fix.  Check it in.

Ok, committing to mainline and e500.  The e500 branch doesn't
technically need it, but it won't hurt.

References:
- Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- [patch] Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [patch] Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8)))short a = {1, -1};?
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] Re: What happens with __attribute__((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?

Re: [patch] Re: What happens with attribute((vector_size(8))) short a = {1, -1};?