This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Symbol visibility build failure on Solaris


On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:50:08PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:55:10PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >  - My installed GCC is 2.95.3.  It has an <assert.h> which references
> >     __eprintf.
> ...
> >  - stl-inst.o, when compiled, has two calls to assert which reference
> >     __eprintf.  But it's linked with -shared-libgcc, so they are unresolved.
> 
> So why is the build of stl-inst.o picking up 2.95's assert.h?
> 
> You *should* be picking up /usr/include/assert.h, which should
> not reference __eprintf.

Hrm, that's a really good question, now that you ask.  I would go and
find out, but 3.3 doesn't suffer from this problem, so bugs in a 2.95
host compiler and a 3.2 build process aren't really worth following.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]