This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:26:26 -0400
Subject: Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 03:11 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Added a PCH component (at the request of Neil), moved all bugs tagged
[PCH] in the summary to it.
Please ensure that this component is documented - in bugzilla.html if we get that soon, otherwise in gnats.html where existing components are documented - and added to gccbug.in.
I believe this is still open?

Is it?

I'm not even sure bugzilla.html is actually necessary for describing components, thinking more about it. You can get descriptions for components just by clicking on the word "Components" in a bug report (new or existing), and it will take you to a page that describes each component.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Re: log_accum_bugzillafied seems to work
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]