This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ compile time (again)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 13 Jun 2003 11:51:36 -0400
Subject: Re: C++ compile time (again)
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200306130918.03390.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <3EE9EE36.5030605@student.tudelft.nl> <200306131042.11274.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>

On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:42, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:

> Maybe, or maybe not. It would be nice if we actually measured. The usual 
> benchmark is bootstrap time, but that is 90% C and the C++ part is not 
> representative for some C++ applications.
> 
Agreed.  We definitely need C++ intensive code.  And Java too, for that
matter.


Diego.

References:
- C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: C++ compile time (again)
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]