This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bugs and versions affected (Was Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule)
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
- To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>, "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:40:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Bugs and versions affected (Was Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule)
- References: <91A1DD70-9D02-11D7-A766-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> <1c4501c33199$f0708890$e14e2697@bagio>
> > Does everyone *else* want this scheme too?
It would be nice to have it, but I can see how it would make some things
really complicated and the interface somewhat awkward. I think we've become
pretty good in detecting regressions the "old-fashioned" way, so I don't
think it should be a priority. But I'm not opposed to it either, rather
somewhat indifferent -- things are in relatively good shape recently, I
think.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/