This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Partial autoconf transition thoughts
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at ds2 dot pg dot gda dot pl>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Bernd Jendrissek <berndfoobar at users dot sourceforge dot net>, Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:36:14 +0200 (MET DST)
- Subject: Re: Partial autoconf transition thoughts
- Organization: Technical University of Gdansk
On 12 Jun 2003, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > That's the place for libbfd for the host
>
> Exactly. $exec_prefix is already supposed to be host-specific, so you
> don't need $host_alias there again. If you build bfd for other
> targets, target_alias will be different from host_alias, and
> everything is fine, each libbfd will be in a separate directory.
> Unless you start building different libbfds for the same pair
> (host,target), exec_prefix and target[_alias] should be enough to keep
> them apart.
OK, then what about the following example: on an i386-linux system I have
three shared binaries of libbfd, one is for i386-linux host and i386-linux
target, another one is for i386-linux host and mipsel-linux target and the
last one is for mipsel-linux host and mipsel-linux target. Which one
should go where?
Anyway see 'http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-05/msg00184.html'
and its follow ups for the origin of the choice -- as you took part in the
discussion, I'm actually surprised you are not aware of the current setup.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +