This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>, aph at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 12 Jun 2003 11:12:20 +0200
Subject: Re: implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <16103.25899.63644.433806@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com><16103.26693.386433.402456@cuddles.redhat.com><16103.27124.649769.788499@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com><20030611111016.A741@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

| A message like
| 
| filename.hh.556: warning: `foof' is a type, but has not been declared as a type
| filename.hh.556: (missing `typename' keyword?)
| filename.hh.556: This warning will become an error in future releases.
| 
| might be better.

Completely agreed.  I wish we had this kind of suggestion some months
ago. 

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
  - From: Paul Koning
- implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: implicit typename deprecated, "see documentation"
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]