This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
- From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>, vmakarov at redhat dot com,matz at suse dot de, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 10 Jun 2003 12:52:03 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Insert on edge comment
- References: <200306101642.h5AGg8ni023167@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 12:42, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <1055262334.6414.178.camel@p4>, Andrew MacLeod writes:
> >
> >Does that make any sense? It doesnt seem like a lot of work...
> I was referring to dropping the nested structure entirely. Fixing
> GOTOs, SWITCHES or any of them piecemeal isn't terribly difficult,
> but taken as a whole it gets more complex.
>
You are still going to need to add a conditional goto/branch of some
sort in order to do this tho right? That seems like the first step.
then we can trivially "lower" from containers at an early stage until we
just dont generate them any more :-)
Or we could simply tackle them right off the bat.... just more work
upfront.
Andrew