This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why does sparc build for you? or, why are make check resultsreported when it hasn't bootstrapped since May 5?
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:47:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Why does sparc build for you? or, why are make check resultsreported when it hasn't bootstrapped since May 5?
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Brad Lucier wrote:
> I guess I'm a little prickly after trying to build sparc for a month after
> reporting a bootstrap failure and *then* being told that sparc isn't tested
> enough.
Understandably so. Fact is, I couldn't find a lot of useful test
results for sparc. Granted I didn't dig far back through
gcc-testresults, and I only recently resubscribed to gcc, so I didn't
see messages from Kaveh and others.
It doesn't help that bootstrap failures aren't generally posted to
gcc-testresults. I noticed the problem myself, intended to start a binary
search and promptly got busy/lazy/sleep-deprived/etc.
If you are trying to regularly submit test results bootstrapping with
libjava & multilibs, it is certainly appreciated.
Jeff