This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Bonzini" <bonzini at gnu dot org>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<jbuck at synopsis dot com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:58:56 +0200
Subject: Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
References: <004101c32a6b$01574670$40dc1d97@bonz> <200306051007.12979.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <87smqo4h8h.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

> That change worries me.  GAS may be happy to take .section with no
> quotes, but how do we know all the assemblers out there are equally
> content?

I personally think that the question is rather: was this check ever intented 
to work with anything else than GNU as and GNU ld?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
  - From: Bonzini
- Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: non-portable construct in gcc configure script
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]