This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:16:20 -0700
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
References: <1054822579.19594.18.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <wvlllwgo8wr.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> <1054826244.19594.32.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <16095.25436.39706.614853@cuddles.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:35:56PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Diego Novillo writes:
>  > Is this an invalid use of __asm__ then?

I don't think so.

> I think so.  The asm is asking for a mem operand for something that it
> never intends actually to access.

It DID access it.  With a prefetch instruction.



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Never gimplify ASM_EXPRs
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]