This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Laurent GUERBY <guerby at acm dot org>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Michael S.Zick" <mszick at goquest dot com>, law at redhat dot com, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:48:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

On Sunday, June 1, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:

Talking about performance, do people think that target arithmetic, if
done without particular care for performance, will be on the profiler
radar?

Nope.

Do we have way to measure / count how many target arithmetic operations
we do when compiling "typical" program? (Even approximatively
with a quick hack to add a few counters.)

Yes. I suspect < 0.1%. Make the compile 10x faster, and maybe, we might have to worry about it, wake me when we've done that.

[ I speak from numbers collected from the Finder_FE C++ compilation time benchmark I have, obviously everyone's experience will differ from mine. :-) ]

References:
- Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]