This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Michael S. Zick <mszick at goquest dot com>
Cc: law at redhat dot com,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:51:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95

On Sunday, June 1, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote:

On Saturday 31 May 2003 09:08 pm, law@redhat.com wrote:


[ I suspect asking the g95 folks to rewrite their code to avoid GMP
  probably isn't going to be well received :-) ]

jeff

Yea - right after C is rewritten not to depend on libc.
I hereby grant my trophy for unpopular suggestions to jeff.

Wasn't there discussion a while back about wanting to use GMP (or a subset) for doing host math anyway? But it wasn't done because we didn't want to add another library requirement? If G95 is going to need it, maybe we should just use it and be done with it? Or am i remembering all this wrong?

Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- Re: [G95] Re: [tree-ssa] Integrating g95
  - From: Michael S . Zick

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]