This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 30 May 2003 17:21:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
References: <200305301925.h4UJPvPY019210@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <wvlr86g16kb.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 17:13, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 13:25:57 -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
> 

> 
> If we need to represent these explicitly, it leads me to wonder again why
> we're retaining the control flow structures at all.
> 
> Andrew: With the current situation, you can move the target of a particular
> switch case by moving the CASE_LABEL_EXPR into the new block.

Yeah, thats what Im curently in the process of doing. Now I have
confirmation that it *should* work :-)

Thanks

Andrew

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] Switch stmts and inserting on edges
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]