This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Suggestion for new keywords in bugzilla


Volker Reichelt wrote:
Nathanael Nerode wrote:


* diagnostic (for error messages/warnings that are misleading or broken
 and superfluous/missing warnings)

I actually thought that there should be two keywords for this:


missing-diagnostic (There should be a warning, but there isn't.)
misleading-diagnostic (There's a warning which shouldn't be there, or should be replaced by a different warning.)


I don't think that we really need two keywords, because the volume is low:
We now have thirty-something PRs with the stamp "[diagnostic]" in the
summary line. They all fit on a single screen. And even if the number
doubled, the number would still be small compared to "ice-on-(in)valid-code"
for example.
Missing diagnostics and misleading diagnostics are often very different kinds of issues requiring different skills to fix, which is why I thought the distinction might be useful.

I defer to the opinion of this list. :-)

And we still have the summary line where we can give information like
"misleading".

Btw, thanks for adding the keyword "error-recovery"!
I saw consensus. :-)

Regards,
Volker


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]