This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:04:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
References: <20030516144401.A4222@lucon.org> <je7k8q7dc9.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20030516152508.A4885@lucon.org> <20030517004318.GA18262@redhat.com> <20030516184522.A7603@lucon.org> <20030517181559.GA18692@redhat.com> <20030517134317.B22720@lucon.org> <20030517235928.GA18777@redhat.com> <20030520155854.A12371@lucon.org>

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:58:54PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> March 15, 1999, version 2.4E has the same wording. Oct. 10, 1997,
> version 2.3E says

Ok, we just missed it.  I guess we're going to have to 
have a flag day for gcc ia64...


r~

References:
- Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Does gcc violate the ia64 ABI?
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]