This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Optimization

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Piotr Wyderski <piotr dot wyderski at hoga dot pl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 20:12:07 -0400
Subject: Re: Optimization

I have a PR for it: optimization/10474.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Friday, May 2, 2003, at 19:06 US/Eastern, Richard Henderson wrote:

I see that there's also a greedy stack frame allocator instead
of a lazy one. Using the previous example

[...]

when C is short and can be computed using only the scratch
registers, i.e. eax, edx and ecx, and D is complex and needs
to save/restore the remaining GP registers,

Yes, this is called "shrink-wrapping", and we don't implement it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimization
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: Optimization
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]