This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, "Cook, Kelley (R.K.)" <kcook34 at ford dot com>, "'David O'Brien'" <obrien at freebsd dot org>, "'GCC'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:48:39 -0700
Subject: Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
References: <E70D26A9CDD5C04D806EB8CA831D07210FC506@na1ecm61.dearborn.ford.com> <20030501091710.A21602@synopsys.com> <20030502024926.GA3200@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au>

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 12:49:27PM +1000, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> Does the warning still occur if the variable is declared "volatile"?
> (It shouldn't.) 

Why do you believe "volatile" affects anything except
how accesses of this variable are handled?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Fergus Henderson

References:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Cook, Kelley (R.K.)
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]