This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: GCC 3.3 Status
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 27 Apr 2003 23:03:11 -0700
- Subject: RE: GCC 3.3 Status
- References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F3732B@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl>
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 16:14, S. Bosscher wrote:
> Mark,
>
> You already have downgraded quite a few PRs, and now you're about to
> downgrade a few more. I think that for 3.3 it is the right decision (heck,
> it's got to go out now, can't wait forever), but is it your intention to
> upgrade those PRs again once 3.3 is released?
For most of them, I'm just taking the 3.3 out of the synopsis; that
pushes them into the 3.4 list. For something like "unclear error
message", I might downgrade the PR to medium priority; I'm not sure that
we'd ever hold up a release for that.
> Many PRs against 3.3 have been simply ignored, or were not recognised as
> regressions, for some time (until Wolfgang started his Great Work of
> analysing all those PRs). Most of them are still present on the trunk. And
> they _are_ regressions, even if everybody agrees that they should not hold
> up 3.3 any longer.
Yes, Wolfgang's contribution has been massive. Truly outstanding. And
yes, we need to try to fix more of these for 3.4.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark at codesourcery dot com