This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs


On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>                  -O0           -O1          -O2	   -O3
>> GCC 3.0.4       27.95         44.52	      56.57	  56.48
>> 3.2-branch      29.87 +7%     54.28 +22%   70.95 +25%  75.29 +33%
>> 3.3-branch      29.09 +4%     57.11 +30%   78.99 +40%  81.61 +44%
>> mainline        27.06         56.09        77.77	  82.02
>>
>> Here we have +30% when comparing against 3.0.4 for -O1, and +40% for -O2!
> Yes -- but what is a bit surprising (at least, to me) is that most of
> the slowdown is already introduced at -O1.
>
> What do the time reports tell you, which parts are the biggest losers?
> I assume you left the default GC params in for 3.3 and mainline?

Yes, so in a sense if was unfair towards _older_ releases, and the
current CVS sources are even worse. :-(

Dan Nicolaescu and Kaveh Ghazi did some further analyses

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg00516.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg00251.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg00252.html

and I know also updated PR/8361 with this new information.

Gerald

PS: Note that I first filed this problem as PR 3083 close to two years
ago. :-(


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]