This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT

From: Laurent Guerby <guerby at acm dot org>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 11 Apr 2003 12:57:50 +0200
Subject: Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
Organization:
References: <10304102149.AA03328@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20030410220624.GE4350@redhat.com> <1050057861.4038.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20030411124809.C24876@dublin.int.act-europe.fr>

On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 12:48, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Question to ACT: is "gnatbind -C" here for other than historical reasons
> > (supporting previous gnatbind without the feature to generate Ada)?
> 
> Yes, it is also there to detect and work around cases where the Ada and the C
> compiler won't handle main files identically (e.g. special handling of
> the "main" function, ...).

So in the context of the compiler bootstrap process, since
we know the compiler (GCC/GNAT), there's no reason to use -C, right?

Yes of course in other contexts -C might prove useful :).

-- 
Laurent Guerby <guerby at acm dot org>

References:
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Laurent Guerby
- Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]