This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Mark J Roberts <mjr at znex dot org>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:42:45 -0700
Subject: Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.
References: <20030410225000.GA12733@znex> <20030410234848.GG4350@redhat.com> <20030411013058.GB12733@znex>

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 08:30:58PM -0500, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> Maybe this could be an option? I imagine many people don't use the
> suffixes and would naturally prefer to see more familiar output.

No chance.  The maintainence burden isn't worth it.


r~

References:
- Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.
  - From: Mark J Roberts
- Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.
  - From: Mark J Roberts

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]