gcc archive
date index for April, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

April 30, 2003

23:34	Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables	Richard Henderson
22:52	Re: Compilation time	Don Lindsay
21:08	Re: Compilation time	Neil Booth
21:01	Validation Tests	William M. Klein
21:00	Re: fortran io with g77 on redhat 7.2 for itanium ( IA64 )	Toon Moene
20:23	Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13	Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Wolfgang Bangerth
20:07	Re: Compilation time	Zack Weinberg
20:06	Re: [GCC] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL	Robert Dewar
20:02	Re: [GCC] Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC frontend for COBOL	Trevor Jenkins
20:00	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Jack Lloyd
19:56	Re: GCC 3.3	Mike Stump
19:50	Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL	Keisuke Nishida
19:42	Re: GCC 3.3	Steven Bosscher
19:42	Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86	Richard Kenner
19:41	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3) (fwd)	Richard Guenther
19:38	Re: GCC 3.3	Mike Stump
19:36	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Matt Austern
19:30	new register allocator and HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED	Herman ten Brugge
19:29	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	law
19:29	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	law
19:19	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Paul Koning
19:18	Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86	Richard Kenner
19:11	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
19:09	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Karel Gardas
19:08	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Diego Novillo
19:08	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Eric Christopher
18:55	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
18:45	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
18:39	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Matt Austern
18:35	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
18:28	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
18:03	Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86	Laurent Guerby
17:44	Re: GCC 3.3	Gerald Pfeifer
17:43	Re: GCC 3.3 branch slushy	Jason Merrill
17:20	Mainline failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86	H. J. Lu
17:19	Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:00	Re: GCC 3.3 branch slushy	Mark Mitchell
16:58	Re: [3.3] [powerpc-linux] libjava testsuite failures with --enable-debug	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:49	[3.3] [powerpc-linux] libjava testsuite failures with --enable-debug	Matthias Klose
16:49	Re: GCC 3.3 branch slushy	Jason Merrill
16:45	Re: GCC 3.3 branch slushy	Benjamin Kosnik
16:45	Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Wolfgang Bangerth
16:40	Re: why there is not lex.l in gcc/cp	Zack Weinberg
16:32	GCC 3.3 branch slushy	Mark Mitchell
16:18	Re: Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:42	Using incomplete types to instantiate STL-Templates?	Christian Ehrhardt
14:51	Using mem_attrs to get the tree of a function being called?	Alexandre Courbot
14:33	Add Giovanni Bajo as GNATS only maintainer	Wolfgang Bangerth
12:45	Re: fortran io with g77 on redhat 7.2 for itanium ( IA64 )	Winfrid Tschiedel
12:41	Re: I have returned to the land of free software	Gerald Pfeifer
10:01	gcc installation	Gonca Orgulu
08:39	Re: fortran io with g77 on redhat 7.2 for itanium ( IA64 )	Philipp Thomas
08:37	Re: GCC warnings for unused global variables	Philipp Thomas
08:32	why there is not lex.l in gcc/cp	石 峰
07:47	Re: --program-prefix not working	Alexandre Oliva
07:38	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Jakub Jelinek
07:34	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Jamie Lokier
02:17	I have returned to the land of free software	Michael Meissner
01:39	Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL	ogochan
00:57	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:55	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:51	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Timothy J. Wood
00:31	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Matt Austern

April 29, 2003

22:36	additions to the 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
22:04	Re: GCC 3.3	Arnaud Charlet
21:53	Re: fortran io with g77 on redhat 7.2 for itanium ( IA64 )	Toon Moene
21:33	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Mike Stump
20:56	GCC warnings for unused global variables	Alexander Kabaev
20:28	Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL	Robert Dewar
20:26	Re: gcc 3.3: miscompilation with -fnew-ra	Michel LESPINASSE
20:11	Re: [open-cobol-list] GCC front end for COBOL	Tim Josling
19:30	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Phil Edwards
19:30	Re: gcc 3.3: miscompilation with -fnew-ra	Michael Matz
19:21	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
19:18	Re: Compilation time	Jan Hubicka
19:18	Re: GCC 3.3	Ulrich Weigand
19:15	Re: GCC 3.3	Jan Hubicka
19:10	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
19:10	Re: GCC 3.3	Jan Hubicka
19:00	Re: GCC 3.3	Jan Hubicka
18:42	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
18:37	Re: GC special object sizes	Steven Bosscher
18:32	Re: GC special object sizes	Geoff Keating
18:18	Re: Compilation time	Andreas Jaeger
18:09	Re: GCC 3.3	Laurent Guerby
18:05	Re: makeinfo --no-split	Alexandre Oliva
17:52	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Diego Novillo
17:43	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Benjamin Kosnik
17:41	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
17:33	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Benjamin Kosnik
17:29	Re: need help on gcc installation	Andreas Tobler
17:28	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Diego Novillo
17:18	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Daniel Berlin
17:10	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
17:08	Re: Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07	Re: GCC 3.3	Benjamin Kosnik
16:57	Re: GCC 3.3	Christopher Faylor
16:57	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
16:48	Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)	Matt Austern
16:42	Re: GCC 3.3	Scott Robert Ladd
16:34	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
16:33	GC special object sizes	Steven Bosscher
16:27	Re: GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
16:10	Re: GCC 3.3	Benjamin Kosnik
16:09	Re: GCC 3.3	Giovanni Bajo
16:07	Request: South Africa	Frans Maneli
15:26	Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4	Vladimir Makarov
15:18	Re: target/9594: [3.3/3.4 regression] [sh4-elf] Assembler complains pcrel too far.	Joern Rennecke
15:17	Re: GCC 3.3	Steven Bosscher
15:08	Re: gcc 3.3	Wolfgang Bangerth
14:44	Re: GCC 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:31	need help on gcc installation	Gonca Orgulu
14:06	Re: problems re: makeinfo '--split-size' arg?	Gerald Pfeifer
14:02	Re: GCC 3.3	Jan Hubicka
13:46	question?	gs01han
13:37	Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4	Joern Rennecke
13:21	Re: GCC 3.3	Ulrich Weigand
12:51	Re: installation of gcc-3.2.2 on Solaris 8	Gerald Pfeifer
12:42	issues with first scheduling pass on SH4	Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
12:37	installation of gcc-3.2.2 on Solaris 8	Gonca Orgulu
12:23	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Arnaud Charlet
12:20	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Arnaud Charlet
11:46	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Jakub Jelinek
11:20	bootstrap failure: libstdc++.so: undefined reference to`libintl_gettext'	Gerald Pfeifer
11:19	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Laurent Guerby
11:06	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Christoph Hellwig
10:58	Re: GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Arnaud Charlet
10:50	GNAT and NPTL (3.3?)	Laurent Guerby
07:54	fortran io with g77 on redhat 7.2 for itanium ( IA64 )	Winfrid Tschiedel
07:25	Re: RFA: fix default_assemble_visibility (Was: sh-elf toolchainbroken on mainline)	Mark Mitchell
03:48	GCC 3.3	Mark Mitchell
02:40	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Diego Novillo
02:38	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Daniel Berlin
02:24	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Wei Liu
02:09	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Diego Novillo
00:54	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Richard Henderson

April 28, 2003

23:54	Re: mudflap wrappers [patch]	Eyal Lebedinsky
23:46	Re: -msmall-data on Alpha	Richard Henderson
22:41	Re: -msmall-data on Alpha	Richard Henderson
22:33	Re: Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Daniel Berlin
20:30	GCC front end for COBOL	Keisuke Nishida
20:19	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	Joern Rennecke
20:18	Re: GCSE/PRE problem	Mostafa Hagog
19:56	Re: gcc 3.3 default_assemble_visibility problem (Was: Re: sh-elftoolchain broken on mainline)	Andreas Schwab
19:53	GCC 3.2.3 build on PowerPC Debian GNU/Linux 3.0	Matt Kraai
19:44	gcc 3.3 default_assemble_visibility problem (Was: Re: sh-elf toolchain broken on mainline)	Joern Rennecke
19:37	gthr-gnat.[ch] introduce new warnings	Zack Weinberg
18:59	RFA: fix default_assemble_visibility (Was: sh-elf toolchain broken on mainline)	Joern Rennecke
18:55	Re: problems re: makeinfo '--split-size' arg?	Joseph S. Myers
18:48	Re: mudflap wrappers [patch]	Frank Ch. Eigler
18:20	sh-elf toolchain broken on mainline	Joern Rennecke
17:50	problems re: makeinfo '--split-size' arg?	cgd
17:33	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Matt Austern
17:32	gcc 3.2.3 build on suse linux 8.1 (AMD Duron)	Diego Rodrigo
17:27	gcc-ss-20030428 is now available	gccadmin
16:02	Still has problems: Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Wei Liu
13:58	maybe_suppress_debug_info	Devang Patel
13:44	Re: libstdc++ versus -Wcast-align	Benjamin Kosnik
13:11	Re: gcc 3.2.3 Solaris C,C++ build error	Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:38	C++ Parse Tree XML Export	Stefan Straßer
11:34	GCC 3.2.3 BitTorrent Download	alsutton
11:03	Re: Merge ada/adaint.[ch]	Arnaud Charlet
10:29	Re: GCSE/PRE problem	Zdenek Dvorak
09:35	Problem of moving DImode data with no 'movdi' pattern defined	Jie Zhang
08:40	libstdc++ versus -Wcast-align	Gerald Pfeifer
08:34	RE: gcc 3.2.3 Solaris C,C++ build error	Rupert Wood
08:34	Re: gcc 3.2.3 Solaris C,C++ build error	Lars Schouw
08:14	Re: gcc 3.2.3 Solaris C,C++ build error	Lars Schouw
08:06	Re: GCSE/PRE problem	Jan Hubicka
07:26	SV: mempcpy issue and cross compiling feedback	Øyvind Harboe
07:07	Merge ada/adaint.[ch]	Laurent Guerby
06:16	Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD: ICE inlibstdc++-v3/include/bits/ios_base.h:654	Andreas Jaeger
06:03	RE: GCC 3.3 Status	Mark Mitchell
05:57	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Daniel Berlin
05:35	GCSE/PRE problem	Mostafa Hagog
05:22	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Daniel Berlin
04:49	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Wei Liu
04:42	GCSE PRE in GCC	Mostafa Hagog
03:53	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Diego Novillo
03:41	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Wei Liu
03:32	Re: [tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Daniel Berlin
02:59	[tree-ssa] USE or VUSE bugs?	Wei Liu
01:36	Bug? Predefined Processor ID Macros in gcc 3.3	Scott Robert Ladd
01:03	gcc 3.2.3 Solaris C,C++ build error	Lars Schouw

April 27, 2003

21:54	Re: gcc 3.2.3 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOS X 10.2.5/Darwin 6.5	Andrew Pinski
21:02	gcc 3.2.3 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOS X 10.2.5/Darwin6.5	Shrisha Rao
20:27	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	H. J. Lu
20:22	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	H. J. Lu
16:11	ICE in subreg_offset_representable_p	Andreas Schwab
15:43	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	Anthony Green
15:16	Re: C++ Parser problem or I need glasses - template pointer to memberparameters	Nathan Sidwell
15:06	Return address checking for buffer overflow exploit	markw
14:43	C++ Parser problem or I need glasses - template pointer to memberparameters	Gianni Mariani
13:14	ARC/Argonaut questions	rich_d
10:57	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Matthias Benkmann
10:50	Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD: ICE in libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ios_base.h:654	Christian Jönsson
10:36	Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD: ICE inlibstdc++-v3/include/bits/ios_base.h:654	Andreas Jaeger
10:19	Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD: ICE in libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ios_base.h:654	Christian Joensson
06:10	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	Jim Wilson
04:31	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	H. J. Lu
03:36	Honey 4 the Bears	mikes1usa
03:35	mempcpy issue and cross compiling feedback	Garen
02:07	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	Jim Wilson
01:56	Re: Question about integer_asm_op()	Jim Wilson
01:38	-msmall-data on Alpha	Falk Hueffner

April 26, 2003

23:25	[tree-ssa] Crashes in UNSSA	Jan Vroonhof
18:08	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	H. J. Lu
17:42	Re: How well does gcc support cross compile?	Joel Sherrill
16:49	How well does gcc support cross compile?	H. J. Lu
14:42	mudflap: Q re __mf_check READ/WRITE	Eyal Lebedinsky
14:27	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:59	GENERIC/GIMPLE docs (was [tree-ssa] Bootstrap fails with undefinedreference to find_reachable_lable)	Diego Novillo
13:43	RTEMS gcc 3.2.3 build status	Joel Sherrill
12:59	tree-ssa: very simple program segfaults	Eyal Lebedinsky
10:45	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Nathan Sidwell
09:43	mudflap wrappers [patch]	Eyal Lebedinsky
09:12	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Andrew Haley
07:23	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: ICE in natFloat.cc:42in verify_wide_reg, at flow.c:552	Andreas Tobler
04:30	Re: Libstdc++-v3 results for mips-sgi-irix6.5	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:50	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Michael S . Zick
01:40	mudflap - issues with mf-runtime.h	Eyal Lebedinsky
00:35	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Joe Buck
00:13	deprecation of embedded-pic for mips	Eric Christopher

April 25, 2003

23:55	Re: GCC assembler bug	H. J. Lu
23:42	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Aaron Lehmann
23:30	GCC assembler bug	Piotr Wyderski
23:01	more additions to the 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
22:39	Re: ACT tree new files	Robert Dewar
22:32	gcc-3.2.3 + small ada patch successful on i686 Red Hat Linuxrelease 9	Laurent Guerby
22:30	Re: Question about integer_asm_op()	John Lu
22:16	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Matthias Benkmann
22:12	Thanks for "warning: statement with no effect"	Ben Bucksch
22:02	Re: ACT tree new files	Laurent Guerby
21:49	GNATS cleanup: high-priority 3.2/arm bugs	Joe Buck
21:38	Re: GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions	Wolfgang Bangerth
21:36	Re: Question about integer_asm_op()	Richard Henderson
21:30	Re: ACT tree new files	Robert Dewar
21:22	Re: __builtin_va_list bug or feature	Richard Henderson
20:32	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Bruce Korb
20:22	RE: Problems compiling gcc 3.3 on cygwin	Øyvind Harboe
20:09	Re: GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions	Joe Buck
19:58	Re: ACT tree new files	Laurent Guerby
19:42	Question about integer_asm_op()	John Lu
19:41	RE: Problems compiling gcc 3.3 on cygwin	Øyvind Harboe
19:37	Re: c++/10437: "using namespace" at global scope creates incorrectcode	Wolfgang Bangerth
19:37	gcc-3.2.3 successful on i686 RedHat 7.3	Davide Prina
19:30	PATCH: Accept new MAINTAINER spot	Loren James Rittle
19:01	I have a small problem...	Michael Zappe
18:56	Re: problems compiling in GCC 3.2.2 - while in 2.95.3 everythingwent fine	Gerald Pfeifer
18:45	problems compiling in GCC 3.2.2 - while in 2.95.3 everything went fine	Gabriel Marcelli
18:45	Re: GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions	Wolfgang Bangerth
18:41	Re: GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions	Joe Buck
18:30	Re: ACT tree new files	Robert Dewar
18:15	Re: __builtin_va_list bug or feature	Joseph S. Myers
18:14	Re: GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions	Wolfgang Bangerth
18:02	Re: __builtin_va_list bug or feature	Gisle Vanem
17:43	Re: ACT tree new files	Laurent Guerby
17:32	GNATS cleanup time for 3.2 regressions?	Joe Buck
17:16	Loren becomes FreeBSD ports maintainer	Gerald Pfeifer
17:03	Re: additions to 3.2 build status list	Christian Jönsson
17:01	Re: __builtin_va_list bug ir feature	Joseph S. Myers
17:01	more 3.2.3 build status reports	Joe Buck
16:42	additions to 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
15:40	mudflap - wrapper question	Eyal Lebedinsky
15:37	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
15:13	Re: Problems compiling gcc 3.3 on cygwin	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:55	Re: Profiling on S390	Jan Hubicka
14:45	Re: -malign-natural for Linux PPC64 and AIX	David Edelsohn
14:25	-malign-natural for Linux PPC64 and AIX	Kevin B. Hendricks
14:17	__builtin_va_list bug ir feature	Gisle Vanem
14:09	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Paul Koning
14:09	Re: mudflap wrappers [patch]	Eyal Lebedinsky
14:07	libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.9	Gerald Pfeifer
13:52	Re: mudflap wrappers [patch]	Steven Bosscher
13:51	Re: ACT tree new files	Robert Dewar
13:46	Re: Problems compiling gcc 3.3 on cygwin	Øyvind Harboe
13:21	SV: Trying to compile gcc-3_3-branch with CygWin	Øyvind Harboe
13:06	Trying to compile gcc-3_3-branch with CygWin	Andrew Haley
12:53	Re: gcc 3.2.3 on Tru64 5.1B	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47	Trying to compile gcc-3_3-branch with CygWin	Øyvind Harboe
12:47	gcc 3.2.3 on Tru64 5.1B	Lionel GIRAUDEAU
12:36	Re: mudflap wrappers [patch]	Eyal Lebedinsky
12:32	Re: libmudflap	Eyal Lebedinsky
12:29	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Andrew MacLeod
12:19	Re: Ada and NTPL	Robert Dewar
12:14	mudflap wrappers [patch]	Eyal Lebedinsky
11:16	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
11:11	[tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
09:00	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gareth Pearce
08:59	libmudflap	Eyal Lebedinsky
08:49	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Nathan Sidwell
08:07	PATCH for Re: GCC-3.2.3 released	Gabriel Dos_Reis
08:01	PATCH for Re: GCC-3.2.3 released	Gerald Pfeifer
07:36	Re: compiler confusion?	wilson k.j
07:16	GCC-3.2.3 released	Gabriel Dos_Reis
05:25	Re: gcc-3.3: ICE error using -msse2 -O3 in pentium4-pc-linux-gnu	Guillermo Ballester Valor
04:07	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	John Quigley
03:11	Re: [tree-ssa] Translation out of SSA	law
02:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Translation out of SSA	Andrew MacLeod
02:11	Re: GCC CPP not expanding macro correctly?	Segher Boessenkool
02:03	Re: [tree-ssa] Translation out of SSA	law
01:23	Re: DOS line endings	Mike Stump
01:02	Re: autoconf is the wrong tool to use	Mike Stump
00:09	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson

April 24, 2003

23:52	Re: gcc-3.3: ICE error using -msse2 -O3 in pentium4-pc-linux-gnu	Wolfgang Bangerth
23:35	[web page] announce GCC Developers Summit	Janis Johnson
23:27	Re: [tree-ssa] Translation out of SSA	Jan Vroonhof
23:24	gcc-3.3 ICE error using -msse2 -O3 in pentium4-pc-linux-gnu	Guillermo Ballester Valor
23:15	3.2.3 installation successes: Red Hat 7.2 (i686), HP-UX 11 (HPPA)	Joe Buck
21:32	Re: gcc3.2 coredump in exception handling	Benjamin Kosnik
21:17	ACT tree new files	Laurent Guerby
20:06	Re: gcc3.2 coredump in exception handling	Phil Edwards
19:52	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jason Merrill
19:36	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Joseph S. Myers
19:31	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geert Bosch
19:07	RE: gcc3.2 coredump in exception handling	Shen Wu
18:56	Re: gcc3.2 coredump in exception handling	Phil Edwards
18:52	gcc3.2 coredump in exception handling	Shen Wu
18:39	Bootstrap failure today	Krzysztof Parzyszek
18:04	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jason Merrill
17:53	Re: asm as "memory barrier"	Richard Henderson
17:48	Re: asm as "memory barrier"	Paul Koning
17:47	Re: spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Aaron Lehmann
17:35	spam mail fodder from public mailing lists	Gray Watson
17:32	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Zack Weinberg
17:25	[Web Pages] cvs.html problem	Richard Almquist
17:19	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jason Merrill
16:15	Installed gcc-3.2.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Charles Williams
15:23	Re: [3.3] libstdc++-v3/config/locale/generic/c_locale.h breaksbootstrap	Gerald Pfeifer
15:18	Re: Ada and NTPL	Geert Bosch
15:12	Re: [3.3] libstdc++-v3/config/locale/generic/c_locale.h breaksbootstrap	Benjamin Kosnik
15:02	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3 vs. libsnprintfv	DJ Delorie
14:45	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Michael S . Zick
14:44	[3.3] libstdc++-v3/config/locale/generic/c_locale.h breaks bootstrap	Gerald Pfeifer
13:33	Re: RFC: rename -fbranch-probabilities	Nathan Sidwell
13:12	Re: compiler confusion?	Gareth McCaughan
13:06	RFC: rename -fbranch-probabilities	Andrew Pinski
12:25	-fcheck-stack and goto	Ulrich Weigand
11:48	Re: Ada and NTPL	Richard Kenner
11:45	Vector modes and C++ not supported?	Richard Guenther
11:39	Re: how can I solve this problem?	Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
11:24	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3 vs. libsnprintfv	Gary V. Vaughan
10:56	Query	Andrew Haley
10:32	Query	Vijay Kamath
09:33	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
08:43	Re: Ada and NTPL	Chris Proctor
07:12	Ada and NTPL	Laurent Guerby
07:00	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: ICE in natFloat.cc:42 in verify_wide_reg, at flow.c:552	Christian Joensson
06:23	0981870334-ID: We are glad to inform you about the changes in our website	g_a_l_l_a
06:21	how can I solve this problem?	변용덕
05:47	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geert Bosch
05:42	Re: GCC CPP not expanding macro correctly?	Neil Booth
03:45	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
03:33	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jason Merrill
03:20	Re: stabs and macro information	Jim Blandy
03:01	RE: autoconf is the wrong tool to use	Kean Johnston
02:54	Re: An error of gcc-ss-20030303	Jie Zhang
01:32	Re: GCC CPP not expanding macro correctly?	Segher Boessenkool
01:21	Re: What is GENERIC?	Joe Buck
01:09	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Geoff Keating
00:17	What is GENERIC?	Zakharin Vyacheslav

April 23, 2003

23:51	Re: PATCH: Does __sync_bool_compare_and_swap on ia64 have wrong return type?	Richard Henderson
23:35	Re: On alignment	Jamie Lokier
23:11	PATCH: Does __sync_bool_compare_and_swap on ia64 have wrong return type?	H. J. Lu
22:45	Re: Does __sync_bool_compare_and_swap on ia64 have wrong return type?	Richard Henderson
22:43	Re: autoconf is the wrong tool to use	Richard Henderson
22:38	Re: asm as "memory barrier"	Richard Henderson
22:35	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Alexandre Oliva
22:33	Does __sync_bool_compare_and_swap on ia64 have wrong return type?	H. J. Lu
22:27	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Alexandre Oliva
22:20	Re: An error of gcc-ss-20030303	Richard Henderson
22:08	autoconf is the wrong tool to use	Kean Johnston
21:50	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Vladimir Merzliakov
21:45	Re: Profiling on S390	Richard Henderson
21:29	Re: An error of gcc-ss-20030303	tm_gccmail
21:09	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Geoff Keating
21:03	Re: Profiling on S390	Richard Henderson
20:23	Re: Profiling on S390	Ulrich Weigand
19:57	Re: On alignment	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:56	Re: Profiling on S390	Jan Hubicka
19:56	asm as "memory barrier"	Paul Koning
19:52	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99warning at pch using	Benjamin Kosnik
19:47	Re: On alignment	Tom Tromey
19:43	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Andreas Schwab
19:34	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Richard Henderson
19:33	Re: Profiling on S390	Richard Henderson
19:25	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Andreas Schwab
19:24	Re: On alignment	Robert Dewar
19:18	Re: On alignment	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:13	Re: On alignment	Joern Rennecke
19:13	Re: On alignment	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:03	Re: libstdc++ testsuite failures and GLIBCPP_BUILD_PCH	Benjamin Kosnik
18:52	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Joe Buck
18:50	Re: Profiling on S390	Jan Hubicka
18:42	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Vladimir Merzliakov
18:30	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
18:26	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Alexandre Oliva
18:25	Re: [PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Geoff Keating
18:20	libstdc++ testsuite failures and GLIBCPP_BUILD_PCH	Janis Johnson
18:18	Re: On alignment	Tom Tromey
18:06	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Jakub Jelinek
17:50	Re: Profiling on S390	Richard Henderson
17:41	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Alexandre Oliva
17:21	Re: gcc compile?	Joe Buck
17:21	Re: Profiling on S390	Ulrich Weigand
16:42	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
16:09	texi2pod.pl has problems with @tex and @quotation	Dalibor Topic
16:07	Re: On alignment	Tom Tromey
16:03	Re: PR 10196 / Re: Inliner parameters	Steven Bosscher
15:46	Re: PR 10196 / Re: Inliner parameters	Mark Mitchell
15:23	RE: DOS line endings	Boehm, Hans
15:17	Re: Target deprecation list	Zack Weinberg
14:19	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
13:32	compiler confusion?	Ivan Molella
13:29	compiler confusion?	Ivan Molella
13:16	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Daniel Jacobowitz
12:52	Re: GCC 3.3 Status	Jan Hubicka
12:49	Re: On alignment	Jamie Lokier
12:21	compiler confusion?	Ivan Molella
12:19	[PCH bug] anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99 warning at pch using	Vladimir Merzliakov
12:09	Re: PR 10196 / Re: Inliner parameters	Richard Guenther
11:55	Re: PR 10196 / Re: Inliner parameters	Steven Bosscher
11:46	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Andreas Schwab
11:39	PR 10196 / Re: Inliner parameters	Richard Guenther
10:59	Re: Profiling on S390	Ulrich Weigand
10:36	Re: DOS line endings	Joseph S. Myers
09:32	RE: Target deprecation list	Nitin Gupta
08:49	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Joseph S. Myers
08:08	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Daniel Berlin
07:45	Re: Profiling on S390	Jan Hubicka
07:42	An error of gcc-ss-20030303	Jie Zhang
07:40	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:38	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:26	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Phil Edwards
07:21	Re: Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Daniel Berlin
07:00	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gareth Pearce
06:47	Stopping daily bump of version.c on old/closed branches	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:32	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:02	Re: GCC CPP not expanding macro correctly?	Neil Booth
05:31	Re: DOS line endings	Zack Weinberg
04:56	Re: DOS line endings	Ranjit Mathew
04:50	Re: Is there a secret formula to rebuild generated files in libffi?	H. J. Lu
04:37	Re: cvs [update aborted]: unrecognized auth response from gcc.gnu.org	Phil Edwards
04:33	Re: DOS line endings	Tom Tromey
04:05	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
03:29	Re: Is there a secret formula to rebuild generated files in libffi?	John David Anglin
02:44	Built GCC 3.2.2	Eric
02:20	GCC CPP not expanding macro correctly?	AWLaFramboise
02:18	cvs [update aborted]: unrecognized auth response from gcc.gnu.org	John David Anglin
01:50	RE: gcc compile?	Xu, Qiang (XSSC SGP)
01:24	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
01:21	Re: Is there a secret formula to rebuild generated files in libffi?	John David Anglin
01:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
00:12	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3 vs. libsnprintfv	Bruce Korb
00:01	Re: Is there a secret formula to rebuild generated files in libffi?	Anthony Green

April 22, 2003

23:56	Re: DOS line endings	Anthony Green
23:55	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3 vs. libsnprintfv	Geoff Keating
23:53	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
23:37	DOS line endings	Zack Weinberg
23:18	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:14	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:14	RE: GCC 3.3 Status	S. Bosscher
23:13	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:54	Is there a secret formula to rebuild generated files in libffi?	John David Anglin
22:34	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3 vs. libsnprintfv	Bruce Korb
22:08	Re: g77 and array limits	Toon Moene
21:40	GCC 3.3 Status	Mark Mitchell
21:21	Re: Profiling on S390	Richard Henderson
21:06	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Matthias Klose
20:43	Re: Profiling on S390	Ulrich Weigand
19:55	Re: Infinite loop with -include and -M	Neil Booth
19:55	Re: altivec support in gcc - bug with vec_mergel	Aldy Hernandez
19:39	Re: gcc compile?	Phil Edwards
19:39	Re: 3.2.3 release notes	Joe Buck
19:35	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Joe Buck
19:24	Re: 3.2.3 release notes	Michael S . Zick
18:46	Re: altivec support in gcc - bug with vec_mergel	Daniel Egger
18:46	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Joe Buck
18:37	Re: g77 and array limits	David Ronis
18:32	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Joe Buck
18:32	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Daniel Jacobowitz
18:24	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Joe Buck
18:24	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
18:19	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Joe Buck
17:45	Re: 3.2.3 release notes	Joe Buck
17:38	Re: PR 9302	Mark Mitchell
17:30	Re: PR 9302	Geoffrey Keating
17:19	Re: PR 9302	Andrew Pinski
17:19	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Zack Weinberg
17:17	Re: writing mudflap wrappers	Frank Ch. Eigler
17:10	PR 9302	Mark Mitchell
16:43	RE: New SCO maintainer: Kean Johnston	Kean Johnston
16:26	Re: On alignment	Robert Dewar
16:22	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
16:19	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
16:11	writing mudflap wrappers	Eyal Lebedinsky
16:09	Re: altivec support in gcc - bug with vec_mergel	Michel LESPINASSE
16:00	Re: On alignment	Nicola Pero
15:38	Re: On alignment	Jason Merrill
15:36	New SCO maintainer: Kean Johnston	Mark Mitchell
15:19	Re: benchmarking (or almabench)	Jeremy Sanders
15:13	RE: benchmarking (or almabench)	Jeremy Sanders
15:11	Re: benchmarking (or almabench)	Daniel Berlin
15:08	RE: benchmarking (or almabench)	S. Bosscher
14:43	benchmarking (or almabench)	Jeremy Sanders
13:15	Re: 3.2.3 release notes	Michael S . Zick
12:37	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
12:05	Re: altivec support in gcc - bug with vec_mergel	Daniel Egger
11:36	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
11:07	Re: On alignment	Robert Dewar
10:59	Re: On alignment	Andreas Schwab
10:53	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
10:50	Re: On alignment	Nathan Sidwell
10:34	Re: On alignment	Andrew Haley
10:09	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:54	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:00	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Andreas Schwab
08:51	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Nathan Sidwell
07:06	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:52	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Kai Henningsen
06:32	Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: ICE in natFloat.cc:42 in verify_wide_reg, at flow.c:552	Christian Joensson
05:59	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
04:49	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:22	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	John Quigley
03:27	Re: Const warning? (was: Re: [Patch] More redundant...)	John Reiser
03:14	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:02	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:58	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Zack Weinberg
02:49	Re: concatenation of string literals	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:47	Re: gcc compile?	Zack Weinberg
02:40	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:33	RE: gcc compile?	Xu, Qiang (XSSC SGP)
02:24	Re: gcc compile?	Zack Weinberg
02:19	Re: concatenation of string literals	Jonathan Lennox
02:09	gcc compile?	Xu, Qiang (XSSC SGP)
01:58	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	John Quigley
01:35	3.2.3 release notes	Joe Buck
00:52	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	DJ Delorie
00:41	Re: Libiberty's snprintf for v3?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:15	Re: concatenation of string literals	DJ Delorie
00:11	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier
00:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier

April 21, 2003

23:48	Re: concatenation of string literals	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:39	Infinite loop with -include and -M	Andreas Schwab
21:41	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:35	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:25	Re: Const warning? (was: Re: [Patch] More redundant...)	Robert Dewar
21:21	Re: improving the complex number division	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:14	Re: improving the complex number division	Robert Dewar
20:59	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:58	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Joe Buck
20:46	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:45	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Matthias Klose
20:42	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier
20:33	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:32	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier
20:22	gcc-3_2-branch frozen	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:10	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
19:46	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Jakub Jelinek
19:44	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier
19:20	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Richard Henderson
19:18	Re: Approval: can I commit this please?	Richard Henderson
18:14	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:14	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Andreas Tobler
18:03	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	David Edelsohn
17:58	GCC-3.2.3 prerelease status	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:54	Re: Release Quality Control	Joe Buck
17:39	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
17:25	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Jamie Lokier
17:05	gcc-ss-20030421 is now available	gccadmin
17:05	Re: Release Quality Control	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:57	Re: Release Quality Control	Mark Mitchell
16:52	Jan/Nathan: New gcov maintainers	Mark Mitchell
16:47	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
16:26	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
16:06	Re: concatenation of string literals	Jonathan Lennox
15:59	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Joe Buck
14:50	SV: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: cppcharset.c:95: warning: field precision is not type int (arg 4)	Christian Jönsson
14:48	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: cppcharset.c:95: warning: field precision is not type int (arg 4)	David Edelsohn
14:47	Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD on sparc64-linux: cppcharset.c:95: warning: field precision is not type int (arg 4)	Christian Joensson
14:30	Re: Const warning? (was: Re: [Patch] More redundant...)	Gawain Bolton
13:56	Re: Release Quality Control	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:54	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Nathan Sidwell
13:52	Re: Release Quality Control	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:49	Re: missing tests for 3.2.3-pre	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:45	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40	Re: improving the complex number division	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:30	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:15	__attribute__((__format__)) syntax bug	Piotr Wyderski
05:09	invalid offsetof from non-POD type	John Quigley
04:58	Re: Crossed-Native Build Weirdness with Current 3.3 Branch	Mark Mitchell
03:36	Re: Crossed-Native Build Weirdness with Current 3.3 Branch	Mohan Embar
03:06	altivec support in gcc - bug with vec_mergel	Michel LESPINASSE
02:21	gcc3.2.2 build notification on mdk8.2	alien23
01:17	Re: help on left-shift	Michael Hayes

April 20, 2003

23:02	Re: Const warning? (was: Re: [Patch] More redundant...)	Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:28	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Gerald Pfeifer
21:19	Re: New GNATS category: PCH	Gerald Pfeifer
18:44	Const warning? (was: Re: [Patch] More redundant...)	Paolo Carlini
04:34	Petsocket's Prank Calls	Petsocket
04:27	Petsocket's Prank Calls	Petsocket
02:26	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
02:23	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar

April 19, 2003

23:49	Re: mainline broken for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Java -msoft-float)	Alan Modra
23:01	Approval: can I commit this please?	Kean Johnston
20:48	help on left-shift	Ming Ouyang
19:52	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Robert Dewar
18:46	Re: improving the complex number division	Robert Dewar
18:26	Bootstrap fails on solaris2.7 in verify_wide_reg at flow.c:552 compiling natFloat.cc	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:10	Re: mainline broken for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Java -msoft-float)	David Edelsohn
14:00	Re: mainline broken for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Java -msoft-float)	Alexandre Oliva
12:11	Re: expand_calls/calls.c change	Richard Kenner
11:56	Re: concatenation of string literals	Neil Booth
11:46	Re: g77 and array limits	Toon Moene
10:51	Re: concatenation of string literals	Matt Kraai
10:11	Re: undefined reference to _gcov_init	Nathan Sidwell
09:11	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD: calls.c:2215: warning: `old_stack_pointer_delta'might be used uninitialized in this function	Andreas Tobler
09:09	Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD: calls.c:2215: warning: `old_stack_pointer_delta' might be used uninitialized in this function	Christian Joensson
07:42	Re: New boostrap failure: ICE in cpplex.c:365	Neil Booth
07:33	Re: New boostrap failure: ICE in cpplex.c:365	Neil Booth
07:17	expand_calls/calls.c change	Neil Booth
07:10	Re: New boostrap failure: ICE in cpplex.c:365	Neil Booth
07:07	Re: concatenation of string literals	Neil Booth
06:58	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Eric Botcazou
06:41	Re: concatenation of string literals	Joseph S. Myers
06:02	Re: New bootstrap fail on PA linux	Andreas Tobler
05:06	Re: concatenation of string literals	Matt Kraai
04:58	undefined reference to _gcov_init	Qiong Cai
04:27	Re: concatenation of string literals	Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:08	concatenation of string literals	Matt Kraai
03:36	Notice to 3.2.3 release manager (a.k.a Gaby), RE pre2	Loren James Rittle
02:07	New boostrap failure: ICE in cpplex.c:365	Kean Johnston

April 18, 2003

23:57	New bootstrap fail on PA linux	John David Anglin
22:28	How's 3.3 coming (was Re: New GNATS category: PCH)	Joe Buck
22:22	Re: missing tests for 3.2.3-pre	Joe Buck
21:36	Re: missing tests for 3.2.3-pre	Loren James Rittle
21:06	Re: New GNATS category: PCH	Daniel Berlin
21:02	New GNATS category: PCH	Neil Booth
20:48	Re: mainline broken for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Java -msoft-float)	Janis Johnson
20:04	Re: first shot at a 3.3 bug fix list	Toon Moene
19:58	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Toon Moene
19:36	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:26	Re: Release Quality Control	David Taylor
18:11	Re: missing tests for 3.2.3-pre	Joe Buck
18:06	missing tests for 3.2.3-pre	Joe Buck
17:25	Re: Release Quality Control	Joe Buck
17:18	mainline broken for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Java -msoft-float)	Janis Johnson
17:06	Bootstrap build of 3.2.2 on Darwin 6.5	Dan Allen
16:48	Re: Release Quality Control	Gerald Pfeifer
16:26	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Joe Buck
16:25	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:19	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Joe Buck
15:06	Re: Cant bootstrap sco3.2v5.0 either (ICE in cfgrtl.c:1916)	Mark Mitchell
14:50	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Geert Bosch
12:46	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Eric Botcazou
12:15	Re: Cant bootstrap sco3.2v5.0 either (ICE in cfgrtl.c:1916)	Richard Henderson
12:11	Re: Can't bootstrap on Linux/ia64	Richard Henderson
11:41	Re: [HEAD] bootstrap error using flex-2.5.31	Patrick Mau
11:34	mudflap+pthread	Eyal Lebedinsky
11:19	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Eric Botcazou
10:44	Re: Cant bootstrap sco3.2v5.0 either (ICE in cfgrtl.c:1916)	Jan Hubicka
10:41	Profiling on S390	Jan Hubicka
10:29	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
09:21	Re: [PATCH] Re: Using C++ within a backend? (contd)	Matthieu Moy
08:59	[HEAD] bootstrap error using flex-2.5.31	Matthias Klose
08:06	gcc 3.3: miscompilation with -fnew-ra	Michel LESPINASSE
07:43	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Andrew Haley
06:50	Cant bootstrap sco3.2v5.0 either (ICE in cfgrtl.c:1916)	Kean Johnston
05:02	Re: Can't bootstrap on Linux/ia64	H. J. Lu
03:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
01:16	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
01:14	Re: Target deprecation list	Mark Mitchell
01:11	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the treeinliner	Daniel Berlin
00:52	Re: Target deprecation list	Jeff Epler
00:27	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the treeinliner	Steven Bosscher
00:14	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson

April 17, 2003

23:50	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Dale Johannesen
23:48	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Tolga Dalman
23:38	Re: Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Mike Stump
23:22	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:20	Re: Target deprecation list	Mark Mitchell
23:19	Re: target_flags	DJ Delorie
23:01	ask help on lshift (logical left shift)	Ming Ouyang
22:59	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Tolga Dalman
22:41	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:41	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
22:32	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
22:32	Re: type aliasing (was: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code)	Tolga Dalman
22:16	Memory footprint/compile time explosion caused by the tree inliner	Eric Botcazou
22:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geert Bosch
21:57	Re: target_flags	Zack Weinberg
21:44	Re: Make reload to avoid invalid subregs	Richard Henderson
21:41	Re: target_flags	DJ Delorie
21:40	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Joe Buck
21:06	Re: target_flags	Zack Weinberg
20:46	Re: target_flags	DJ Delorie
20:35	Re: target_flags	Zack Weinberg
20:30	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:25	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:24	Followup to PR/2288	Krzysztof Parzyszek
20:22	Re: target_flags	DJ Delorie
20:16	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
20:10	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
20:04	Re: gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:52	Re: gcc 3.3 -O3 produces bad code	Wolfgang Bangerth
19:42	Re: Release Quality Control	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32	Re: Help interpreting RTL dumps	law
19:28	gcc 3.3 -03 produces bad code	Ronald Kukuck
19:10	Re: Release Quality Control	Joe Buck
18:46	Re: Release Quality Control	Michael S . Zick
18:30	Re: 8 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-04-16T21:21:05Z.	Richard Henderson
18:15	gcc configuration...!	vilas
18:04	Re: 8 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-04-16T21:21:05Z.	Geoff Keating
17:54	Re: Can't bootstrap on Linux/ia64	Richard Henderson
17:28	Re: Release Quality Control	Joel Sherrill
17:28	Re: 3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	H. J. Lu
17:21	Re: Release Quality Control	Gerald Pfeifer
17:17	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Laurent Guerby
16:58	Can't bootstrap on Linux/ia64	H. J. Lu
16:56	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Zack Weinberg
16:55	Re: Website Suggestions	Gerald Pfeifer
16:46	Re: stabs and macro information	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:39	Re: stabs and macro information	David Taylor
16:16	3.2.3-pre tarball 2: libjava build still fails on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Joe Buck
14:05	Configuring a new target	Roger.Gough
14:01	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Aldy Hernandez
13:46	Re: Linking cc1 to external libraries	Alexandre Courbot
13:29	Re: Linking cc1 to external libraries	Alexandre Courbot
13:16	Re: Linking cc1 to external libraries	Alexandre Courbot
13:15	Re: Target deprecation list	Joel Sherrill
13:14	PR java/8260 - how to read/save C structure from java frontend	Andrew Haley
13:13	Re: Inliner parameters	Jan Hubicka
12:56	PR java/8260 - how to read/save C structure from java frontend	Jan Hubicka
12:51	Re: Linking cc1 to external libraries	Andrew Pinski
12:44	Linking cc1 to external libraries	Alexandre Courbot
11:56	Re: 8 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2003-04-16T21:21:05Z.	Joern Rennecke
11:40	Re: RFA: fix for: gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	Richard Henderson
11:31	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Richard Kenner
10:50	RFA: fix for: gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	Joern Rennecke
10:50	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
10:44	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Arnaud Charlet
10:41	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Laurent Guerby
10:18	Re: Inliner parameters	Richard Guenther
09:27	Re: Inliner parameters	Richard Guenther
08:52	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
08:41	Re: improving the complex number division	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:38	[PATCH] Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Matthieu Moy
08:16	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Christian Joensson
08:12	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Christian Joensson
07:54	3.2.3-20030416 : successfully bootstrapped on armv5l-unknown-linux-gnu	jeroen dobbelaere
05:39	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
04:54	RE: Target deprecation list	Nitin Gupta
03:59	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
03:11	Help interpreting RTL dumps	Marty Hauff
02:39	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Alexandre Oliva
01:33	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Zack Weinberg

April 16, 2003

23:22	Re: PCH patch installed in my mainline tree, testing now	Loren James Rittle
23:07	Re: Inliner parameters	Steven Bosscher
22:25	first shot at a 3.3 bug fix list	Joe Buck
22:19	Re: 3.2.3-pre: two successes, one failure (on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Joe Buck
21:38	Re: 3.2.3-pre: two successes, one failure (on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Alexandre Oliva
21:26	Re: 3.2.3-pre: two successes, one failure (on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Phil Edwards
21:21	Re: 3.2.3-pre: two successes, one failure (on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Eric Botcazou
21:20	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Jan Hubicka
21:18	Re: Inliner parameters	Richard Guenther
20:58	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Aldy Hernandez
20:43	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Daniel Egger
20:38	3.2.3-pre: two successes, one failure (on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Joe Buck
20:29	Re: stabs and macro information	Daniel Berlin
19:21	Re: gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	H. J. Lu
18:49	Re: gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	Geoff Keating
18:44	Re: gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	Richard Henderson
18:09	GCC Developers' Summit Update	Andrew J. Hutton
17:59	Re: stabs and macro information	David Taylor
17:52	Re: PCH patch installed in my mainline tree, testing now	Geoffrey Keating
17:38	Re: stabs and macro information	Andrew Cagney
17:27	Re: stabs and macro information	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:26	backend questions	David Welch
17:25	Re: stabs and macro information	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:18	gc.dg/warn-1.c failure	Joern Rennecke
17:16	Re: stabs and macro information	David Taylor
17:12	Inliner parameters	Steven Bosscher
17:03	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:59	Changed gnats bug list	Daniel Berlin
16:50	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Zack Weinberg
16:47	Re: stabs and macro information	Daniel Berlin
16:46	gcc 3.2.3 and RTEMS	Joel Sherrill
16:37	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Ulrich Weigand
16:15	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Aldy Hernandez
16:09	improving the complex number division	Jerome Houdayer
16:07	Re: i386.md warning	Janis Johnson
15:58	stabs and macro information	David Taylor
15:53	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Kumar Gala
15:33	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Aldy Hernandez
15:29	Re: gcc lib/objs	Joe Buck
14:57	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Geert Bosch
14:41	Personal domain name for $8 a year	remove
14:27	Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Alexandre Courbot
14:14	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:01	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	TROCHU Xavier
12:08	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Richard Kenner
12:06	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Richard Kenner
12:03	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Gerald Pfeifer
11:43	i386.md warning	Paolo Carlini
10:49	Re: GNAT ACT source tree	Arnaud Charlet
10:42	GNAT ACT source tree	Laurent Guerby
09:37	gcc lib/objs	wilson k.j
09:25	Re: gnatbind (was DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT)	Arnaud Charlet
08:56	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 2nd iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:46	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Andrew Haley
05:55	Inconsistent behaviour by Archive library and Shared library liked to application	vijay anantharamu kowshik
04:06	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Kumar Gala
02:51	Ping: PR 10101, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01455.html	Andrew Pollard
02:23	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:16	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:15	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:06	PIC port for GCC	Vangelis Rokas
00:48	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Christopher Faylor
00:06	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Zack Weinberg

April 15, 2003

23:56	Re: Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Kumar Gala
22:36	Re: runtestflags for libstdc++?	Benjamin Kosnik
22:07	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	DJ Delorie
22:02	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:53	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Stephan T. Lavavej
21:47	Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Mike Stump
21:43	Branch created: gcc-3_3-e500-branch	Zack Weinberg
21:40	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	David Edelsohn
21:36	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Aldy Hernandez
21:31	Re: Target deprecation list	Eric Christopher
21:26	Re: Target deprecation list	Jeff Epler
21:24	Re: runtestflags for libstdc++?	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:20	Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Kevin Handy
21:14	Re: runtestflags for libstdc++?	Loren James Rittle
21:09	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Geoff Keating
21:00	Re: Is ISO memcmp("abc","ade",10000) safe?	Joern Rennecke
20:50	Re: Target deprecation list	Mark Mitchell
20:44	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Aldy Hernandez
20:39	Re: [RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	law
20:35	Re: Target deprecation list	Richard Henderson
19:08	Re: using stdc++.h.gch	Benjamin Kosnik
19:01	Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Matthieu Moy
18:41	Re: using stdc++.h.gch	Geoff Keating
18:19	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Stan Shebs
18:10	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Kumar Gala
18:02	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Geoff Keating
18:00	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Stan Shebs
17:48	gcc 3.2.3 release notes (final?)	Joe Buck
17:29	Re: Website Suggestions	Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
17:28	Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation	Richard Henderson
17:25	using stdc++.h.gch	Benjamin Kosnik
16:46	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	DJ Delorie
16:38	Re: gcc && gdb	Felix Lee
16:06	Website Suggestions	Mark Moore
16:00	Re: Is ISO memcmp("abc","ade",10000) safe?	Andreas Schwab
15:22	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Benjamin Kosnik
15:17	Re: Target deprecation list	Michael S . Zick
14:54	Re: Is ISO memcmp("abc","ade",10000) safe?	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:51	Re: Is ISO memcmp("abc","ade",10000) safe?	Jakub Jelinek
14:48	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Aldy Hernandez
14:37	Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	Christian Ehrhardt
14:31	Is ISO memcmp("abc","ade",10000) safe?	Roger Sayle
14:15	Re: mudflap problem, and a decode script	Frank Ch. Eigler
14:02	CVS HEAD bootstrap failure becuase of -Werror	Patrick Mau
13:24	Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation	Aldy Hernandez
12:32	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Gerald Pfeifer
11:31	mudflap problem, and a decode script	Eyal Lebedinsky
11:22	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Christian Joensson
11:07	Re: Using C++ within a backend?	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:24	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Loren James Rittle
10:17	Using C++ within a backend?	Alexandre Courbot
09:57	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Eric Botcazou
08:30	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:23	Target deprecation list	Mark Mitchell
06:46	gcc && gdb	Edward Peschko
06:39	shared/archive library order	wilson k.j
04:51	[tree-ssa] libmudflap and OS without a libdl.* library like darwin	Andrew Pinski
04:44	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Kumar Gala
03:51	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:40	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	David Edelsohn
03:40	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Kumar Gala
03:35	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Kumar Gala
00:32	Re: GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Foolish Ewe
00:06	Re: GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Diego Novillo

April 14, 2003

23:52	Re: GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Foolish Ewe
22:56	Re: [RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	John David Anglin
22:28	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Joe Buck
22:22	Re: Release Quality Control	Joe Buck
22:17	Re: [RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	Richard Henderson
22:11	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Steven Bosscher
22:09	Re: init_priority ... would this work?	Richard Henderson
20:54	[PATCH] resubmit of sysroot_subdir gcc.c patch	gp
20:46	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Gerald Pfeifer
20:46	Re: GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Neil Booth
20:34	Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	Neil Booth
20:05	Re: Release Quality Control	Gerald Pfeifer
20:04	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Michel LESPINASSE
19:44	Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	Joseph S. Myers
19:42	Re: Altivec Linux support in GCC	Geoff Keating
19:03	[3.3] warnings in include/xregex2.h	Tolga Dalman
18:59	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	DJ Delorie
18:53	Re: [RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	John David Anglin
18:44	Re: GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Steven Bosscher
17:50	Altivec Linux support in GCC	Kumar Gala
17:45	Re: [RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	law
17:39	Re: Multilib installation problem	Eric Botcazou
17:29	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	Benjamin Kosnik
17:26	Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	Andrew Pinski
17:22	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	H. J. Lu
17:20	Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	David Edelsohn
17:16	[RFC]: Argument setup for sibcalls	John David Anglin
17:16	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	H. J. Lu
17:16	[PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour	Christian Ehrhardt
17:14	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	Andrew Haley
17:08	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	Benjamin Kosnik
17:04	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	DJ Delorie
17:04	Re: Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	Mark Mitchell
17:04	gcc-ss-20030414 is now available	gccadmin
16:57	Fix C++ demangler in libiberty?	H. J. Lu
16:48	Re: Anyone mind if i go about fixing some obvious problems in thegnats DB	Mark Mitchell
16:37	Getting 3.3 out the door	Andrew Haley
16:37	Re: Release Quality Control (was: DOC PATCH: GCC 3.2.3 releaseschedule)	Mark Mitchell
16:35	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nick Ing-Simmons
16:33	Re: Problem with the fix to PR 10234	Joe Buck
16:30	Re: Release Quality Control (was: DOC PATCH: GCC 3.2.3 release schedule)	Joe Buck
16:10	Extending the grammar of trees.	Matthieu Moy
16:08	GCC Parse Tree/Grammar Issues	Foolish Ewe
15:55	Re: Multilib installation problem	Benjamin Kosnik
15:39	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gerald Pfeifer
15:33	Re: Strange offsets in FIELD_DECL's...	Chris Lattner
15:19	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	law
15:07	Fw: Error instaling source gcc 3.2.2 in openbsd 3.2	Leonardo B. Cuquejo
15:00	gcc	Leonardo B. Cuquejo
14:58	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:57	Re: Fail to build crosscompiler for sparc-wrs-vxworks	=?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+
11:50	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Eric Botcazou
11:21	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gerald Pfeifer
11:19	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gerald Pfeifer
09:01	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Andrew Haley
05:00	Strange offsets in FIELD_DECL's...	Chris Lattner
02:26	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Mark Mitchell

April 13, 2003

22:40	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Ulrich Weigand
22:09	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Jakub Jelinek
21:44	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Ulrich Weigand
20:43	RE: init_priority ... would this work?	Kean Johnston
20:04	Re: init_priority ... would this work?	Richard Henderson
20:01	Re: Anyone mind if i go about fixing some obvious problems in the gnats DB	Richard Henderson
19:57	Multilib installation problem	Eric Botcazou
14:46	Fail to build crosscompiler for sparc-wrs-vxworks	=?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+
12:12	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
11:58	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Christian Joensson
07:54	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
06:51	init_priority ... would this work?	Kean Johnston
06:26	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:46	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Christian Joensson
04:38	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Christian Joensson
00:50	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Stephan T. Lavavej

April 12, 2003

21:09	Re: Bootstrap failure of 3.3 on AIX 4.3.2	David Edelsohn
19:32	Bootstrap failure of 3.3 on AIX 4.3.2	Albert Chin
19:02	Re: GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Eric Botcazou
18:42	GCC-3.2.3 prerelease, 1st iteration	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:06	Anyone mind if i go about fixing some obvious problems in the gnats DB	Daniel Berlin
17:59	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:55	Re: install docs and Apple/HP	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:45	Re: install docs and Apple/HP	John David Anglin
15:58	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:55	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52	Make reload to avoid invalid subregs	Jan Hubicka
14:27	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
14:06	Re: Release Quality Control (was: DOC PATCH: GCC 3.2.3 release schedule)	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:01	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
13:51	Re: Problem with the fix to PR 10234	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48	Re: Problem with the fix to PR 10234	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:38	Re: install docs and Apple/HP	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12	Problem with "make clean" in libjava in GNU/linux	Richard Kenner
08:18	gcj	Andrew Haley
05:21	Memcmp on i386 Final Recommendations	Kevin Atkinson
04:34	Re: Error bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD: gcc/profile.c:277: warning: `checksum' might be used uninitialized in this function	Christian Joensson
01:07	RE: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston
00:29	Re: Rename __mempcpy to mempcpy	DJ Delorie
00:22	Rename __mempcpy to mempcpy	Michael Eager
00:01	Re: learning	Ulrich Weigand

April 11, 2003

22:52	GCC on darwin6.5	Will Jenkins
22:26	learning	David Welch
22:08	Re: gnatbind (was DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT)	Laurent Guerby
21:58	Re: gnatbind (was DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT)	Robert Dewar
21:56	Re: gnatbind (was DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT)	Laurent Guerby
21:37	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:28	Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly	hubicka
21:18	TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT not defined for c-opts.c	gp
21:10	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	John David Anglin
21:02	Hung lock in tree	Richard Kenner
20:25	Re: GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Andreas Schwab
20:24	additions to the 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
20:19	Re: GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Daniel Berlin
19:56	Re: Patching libiberty	DJ Delorie
19:52	Patching libiberty	Richard Kenner
19:49	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	DJ Delorie
19:49	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	DJ Delorie
19:40	Re: install docs and Apple/HP	John David Anglin
19:07	Re: GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Andrew Haley
19:01	Re: GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Steven Bosscher
18:55	GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Andrew Haley
18:49	GCC Bugzilla: break long lines please?	Steven Bosscher
18:28	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
18:09	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
17:49	Error bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD: gcc/profile.c:277: warning: `checksum' might be used uninitialized in this function	Christian Joensson
16:59	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Laurent Guerby
16:55	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:51	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
16:50	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
16:41	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
16:09	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Robert Dewar
16:00	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
15:33	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:31	Successful GCC installation	Nick Gray
15:13	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	Andreas Schwab
14:59	data alignment issue?	Andrew Haley
14:52	data alignment issue?	Andrew Haley
14:44	data alignment issue?	Josh . Loeb
14:42	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:16	gcj	John Pretz
13:56	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
11:57	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
11:20	Re: aclocal.m4 error	Andreas Schwab
10:57	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Laurent Guerby
10:53	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	Svein E. Seldal
10:48	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Arnaud Charlet
10:44	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Laurent Guerby
09:37	[For Emacs users] Find easyly the documentation for one node.	Matthieu Moy
09:18	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Richard Henderson
08:16	RE: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston
07:33	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Richard Henderson
07:19	Re: GCC reload problem	David S. Miller
07:16	Re: GCC reload problem	Eric Botcazou
05:59	RE: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston
05:09	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Richard Henderson
05:08	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Richard Henderson
04:45	Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.	Richard Henderson
02:19	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:06	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	DJ Delorie
02:00	Re: __mempcpy vs mempcpy	Svein E. Seldal
01:56	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
01:56	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
01:49	aclocal.m4 error	Kean Johnston
01:31	Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.	Mark J Roberts
01:21	__mempcpy vs mempcpy	Michael Eager
00:46	RE: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston
00:45	Thanks, GCC developers & maintainers (was Re: Another reload bug)	Jeff Epler
00:39	RE: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston
00:31	Re: Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Richard Henderson
00:30	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
00:27	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
00:00	Constructor order help (related to PR 6482)	Kean Johnston

April 10, 2003

23:53	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
23:51	Re: GCC reload problem	David S. Miller
23:51	Re: Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.	Richard Henderson
23:41	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Jan Hubicka
23:35	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Joe Buck
23:26	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Svein E. Seldal
23:11	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Geoff Keating
23:04	RE: Getting 3.3 out the door	Kean Johnston
22:58	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Branko Čibej
22:50	Useless %esp manipulation; omitting "l" suffix in assembly output; getting the address of a label from another function.	Mark J Roberts
22:46	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
22:45	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
22:43	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Branko Čibej
22:42	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Joe Buck
22:33	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
22:31	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Joe Buck
22:31	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
22:24	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Nathanael Nerode
22:23	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:23	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Wolfgang Bangerth
22:16	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
22:08	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
22:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
22:05	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
22:02	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
22:02	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Wolfgang Bangerth
21:57	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:56	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:52	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
21:45	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:44	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
21:44	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:41	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
21:36	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:35	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:32	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
21:32	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geoff Keating
21:31	GCC reload problem	Eric Botcazou
21:29	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Mark Mitchell
21:17	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
21:11	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:10	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:10	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
21:07	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	David Edelsohn
21:04	Re: Another reload bug	Richard Henderson
21:01	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
21:00	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
20:57	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
20:52	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:51	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
20:50	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geoff Keating
20:47	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
20:45	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Robert Dewar
20:43	Re: Reload bug	Dale Johannesen
20:39	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Oscar Fuentes
20:35	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	David Edelsohn
20:28	Re: Getting 3.3 out the door	Peter Barada
20:26	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
20:21	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
20:20	Re: C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Tim Jansen
20:13	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
20:12	Getting 3.3 out the door	Nathanael Nerode
20:03	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
19:46	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	Diego Novillo
19:36	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
19:29	Re: General search for symbols...	Mike Stump
19:20	Re: General search for symbols...	Zack Weinberg
18:36	Re: C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Tim Jansen
18:29	Re: General search for symbols...	Mike Stump
18:24	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Diego Novillo
18:06	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
17:28	Re: SCO port maintainership	Mark Mitchell
16:44	Re: C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Benjamin Kosnik
16:42	Re: C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Joe Buck
16:40	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
16:39	Re: Is it possible to link libraries compiled with gcc 2.9 into a new program using gcc 3.2?	Joe Buck
16:35	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
16:31	Re: Converting to ISO C89	Mark Mitchell
16:20	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	law
16:20	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Geoff Keating
15:47	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
15:32	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
15:31	Re: PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries)	H. J. Lu
15:31	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
15:03	Question on "gcc-no-fixedincludes" (install-no-fixedincludes failure)	Olivier Hainque
15:00	Re: PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries)	H. J. Lu
14:25	Converting to ISO C89	Andrew Haley
12:51	Re: PATCH: Treat RTLD_LOCAL like Solaris (Re: Duplicate dataobjects in shared libraries)	Jason Merrill
12:31	Re: C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Jason Merrill
11:49	Need a copyright assignment form.	Anmol Paralkar
10:13	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
09:37	Re: Weird indentation in the GCC home page	Gerald Pfeifer
09:30	Is it possible to link libraries compiled with gcc 2.9 into a new programusing gcc 3.2?	Erik Nordahl
08:28	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Jason Merrill
07:20	RE: Address Arithmetic Improvement	Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
05:33	Re: General search for symbols...	Zack Weinberg
03:10	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	Diego Novillo
02:27	Re: gcse.c patch breaks simd-2.c	John David Anglin
01:25	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
01:09	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Kenner
00:40	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand

April 09, 2003

23:59	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Richard Henderson
23:59	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Joe Buck
23:31	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Geoff Keating
23:28	Re: gcse.c patch breaks simd-2.c	Geoff Keating
23:19	C++ exception code size / recommended practice	Tim Jansen
22:55	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	law
22:40	Re: DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
22:24	Another reload bug	Eric Botcazou
22:21	Re: gcse.c patch breaks simd-2.c	Roger Sayle
22:13	Re: altivec support in gcc	Michel LESPINASSE
21:23	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Diego Novillo
21:10	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:57	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:37	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Jan Hubicka
20:24	Re: Reload bug	Richard Henderson
19:50	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Steven Bosscher
19:39	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Jan Hubicka
19:36	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-04-06	Diego Novillo
19:19	Re: Address Arithmetic Improvement	tm_gccmail
19:17	RE: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	S. Bosscher
19:15	SCO port maintainership	Kean Johnston
19:10	Re: purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	Zdenek Dvorak
19:04	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Jan Hubicka
18:54	RE: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	S. Bosscher
18:41	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
18:37	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Daniel Berlin
18:30	Re: purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	David Edelsohn
18:28	Re: purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	Andreas Tobler
18:27	Re: purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	Geoff Keating
18:26	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Geoff Keating
18:15	gcse.c patch breaks simd-2.c	Aldy Hernandez
18:10	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	David Edelsohn
18:05	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	Joe Buck
18:00	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
17:02	RE: performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	S. Bosscher
16:57	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
16:50	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
16:19	Re: general mudflap question	Frank Ch. Eigler
16:18	Re: performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	Michael Matz
16:15	Re: altivec support in gcc	Aldy Hernandez
16:11	Re: performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	Jan Van Dijk
15:35	Re: purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	Janis Johnson
14:53	global_namespace?	Alexandre Courbot
14:52	purge_addressof bootstrap failure (was fix opt/8634)	David Edelsohn
12:24	general mudflap question	Eyal Lebedinsky
12:05	Re: performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	Michael Matz
12:04	Address Arithmetic Improvement	Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
11:25	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
09:50	Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.lbe12'	Richard Guenther
09:49	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Richard Earnshaw
09:45	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
09:13	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
09:05	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
08:59	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
08:57	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
08:53	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
08:43	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Steven Bosscher
08:25	.stabs "<internal>",130,0,0,0	Dmitry
07:55	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
07:42	Parse tree weirdness?	Stephen Biggs
07:06	Re: General search for symbols...	Stephen Biggs
07:00	Re: performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	Steven Bosscher
03:00	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:59	performance regressions, profiling _of_ gcc	Jan Van Dijk
00:44	Re: I can not compile code from <<modern c++ design>>	Di Yang

April 08, 2003

23:28	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
23:28	Re: Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
23:16	gcc 3.2.2 successful build	Rob
22:41	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
21:55	Re: How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Jan Hubicka
21:44	Re: Weekly bug summary report added	Daniel Berlin
21:25	Re: Reload bug	Jan Hubicka
21:11	Your free account is waiting otnsq	gonLorren
20:13	How to detect whether we're inside of a loop??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:32	Consultoria de Investimentos e Finanças Pessoais	Adinvest Consultoria e Adminis
19:32	Consultoria de Investimentos e Finanças Pessoais	Adinvest Consultoria e Adminis
19:26	Re: libstdc++ problems with math functions - fixinc or stdc++ problem?	gp
19:06	libstdc++ problems with math functions - fixinc or stdc++ problem?	Kean Johnston
18:57	Re: Compiling problem in Dynix/ptx v4.4.8	Janis Johnson
18:52	Re: Compiling problem in Dynix/ptx v4.4.8	Mike Stump
18:32	Compiling problem in Dynix/ptx v4.4.8	Singh, Harpreet - G Consultan
18:28	Re: HEADS UP: GCC manual soon to be printed	Janis Johnson
18:15	Re: about gcc library	Phil Edwards
17:47	Reload bug	Eric Botcazou
16:53	Re: g77 and array limits	David Ronis
16:39	Re: Weekly bug summary report added	Steven Bosscher
16:29	about gcc library	Mehdi Khaldi
15:50	DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DECL_USER_ALIGNMENT	Ulrich Weigand
15:45	tm.h not protected for double inclusion.	Matthieu Moy
15:17	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Diego Novillo
14:51	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Diego Novillo
14:45	Re: Strange conditional jumps on the POWER4	Roger Sayle
14:27	Re: [tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	law
14:17	[tree-ssa] C++ regressions after merge	Diego Novillo
11:30	Re: PPC support in GCC ?	A.R. Ashok Kumar
11:18	Re: PPC support in GCC ?	Falk Hueffner
10:24	C Reference Manuals	Philippe Preget
10:10	long long constant: bug or feature?	Lev Assinovsky
09:57	Re: I can not compile code from <<modern c++ design>>	Matthias Oltmanns
09:41	fread()	Eyal Lebedinsky
09:28	looking at a wrapper for shmat()	Eyal Lebedinsky
08:53	altivec support in gcc	Michel LESPINASSE
08:01	Linking GCC's front-end to a C++ program.	Matthieu Moy
07:13	3.3 configure grep usage?	Kean Johnston
06:29	Re: gcc ultrasparc generates incorrect code at -02. (!?!?)	Eric Botcazou
05:57	Weekly bug summary report added	Daniel Berlin
05:36	PPC support in GCC ?	A.R. Ashok Kumar
03:19	Get it here.	Got Software?
03:18	Get it here.	Got Software?
00:08	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	David Edelsohn
00:00	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	Mike Stump

April 07, 2003

23:42	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	Phil Edwards
23:03	gcc ultrasparc generates incorrect code at -02. (!?!?)	BBaenisch
22:52	Re: mudflap: how do I give size for 'void *' objects? - example	Eyal Lebedinsky
22:50	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Richard Henderson
22:45	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Richard Henderson
22:32	Re: Strange conditional jumps on the POWER4	David Edelsohn
22:26	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Roger Sayle
22:24	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Jan Hubicka
22:21	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Jan Hubicka
22:12	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Richard Henderson
21:56	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Jan Hubicka
21:32	Re: Inline assembly questions	Richard Henderson
21:00	Re: Is store_expr(e,t,v!=m) safe?	Richard Henderson
20:49	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	David Edelsohn
20:43	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	Zack Weinberg
20:34	Re: Variably sized data types and local functions	Richard Henderson
20:32	Re: __builtin_generic	Richard Henderson
20:28	Re: new unroller vs ppc	tm_gccmail
20:26	Re: Any trick to avoid code bloat with tail call optimization?	Richard Henderson
20:25	Re: relocation truncated to fit error on alpha	Richard Henderson
20:20	Re: new unroller vs ppc	Richard Henderson
20:10	Re: new unroller vs ppc	Jan Hubicka
20:09	Re: new unroller vs ppc	David Edelsohn
20:02	Re: new unroller vs ppc	Zdenek Dvorak
19:54	Re: new unroller vs ppc	Richard Henderson
17:33	Re: Problem with the fix to PR 10234	Gerald Pfeifer
17:30	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog cfgrtl.c testsuite/ChangeLog ...	Joseph S. Myers
17:13	gcc-ss-20030407 is now available	gccadmin
16:06	Re: mudflap: how do I give size for 'void *' objects? - example	Frank Ch. Eigler
15:51	How to control when asm_out_file is printed	Anders Ådland
15:23	Re: Slow memcmp for aligned strings on Pentium 3	Jerry Quinn
13:52	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:30	Re: new unroller vs ppc	Jan Hubicka
12:04	Re: Failure to build opcodes/i386-dis.c on i686-linux: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `lea'	Christian Joensson
10:01	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Steven Bosscher
09:09	Request for copyright assignment form	Arpad Beszedes
08:41	dynamic_cast and typeids on gcc 3.2	Sebastien Ponce
06:54	Re: Inline assembly questions	Zack Weinberg
06:40	Inline assembly questions	Stephen Biggs
02:56	Some 2.95.3 stuff, if anyone cares	Kean Johnston
00:50	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:21	Re: Just a reminder of serious open 3.3 PRs	Kaveh R. Ghazi