This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:13:44 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303291320460.16839@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><u8isu2ryw5.fsf@gromit.moeb><u8llywq5eq.fsf@gromit.moeb><Pine.BSF.4.53.0303310006410.36800@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer writes:
 > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
 > > Gerald, perhaps you also miss the directory?  Run cvs update -d to get
 > > new directories,
 > 
 > Argl, it seems that one tester was indeed lacking -d to avoid getting
 > gcc/ada. Sorry folks!
 > 
 > Now, isn't there _some_ way to use cvs update -d and still being able to
 > avoid certain "new" directories like /gcc/ada?

You perhaps need a module that checks out an approopriate subset of
gcc.  It should be quite easy to create one.

Andrew.

References:
- Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]