This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite


Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR> writes:

>> NGPT is dead, IBM recently announced that they stopped development.
>> You should look at NPTL instead.
>
> Interesting. So this shows that I actually should not look at anything
> until they are integrated and supported :-)
>
> Anyone knows the reason for stopping development of this library ?

NPTL is superior to NGPT and there's no need for two concurrenting
implementations.

>> There're initial patches for NPTL flying around for gdb,
>
> Thanks for the information. So we will continue keeping an eye on it...
> and wait some more, since NTPL does not seem to be quite ready yet.

But neither was NGPT - it only worked on a few platforms.

> Anyway, good to see that most people agree that the current linux threads
> implementation is not viable.

It's not that bad - but it's not POSIX compliant,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
   private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]