This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, toa at pop dot agri dot ch
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:24:13 -0800
Subject: Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
References: <3E84BD67.8050601@pop.agri.ch> <200303282328.SAA26720@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030329002657.GG28069@redhat.com> <200303290258.VAA06759@caip.rutgers.edu>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 09:58:36PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Are you amenable to removing one of them?  I'd suggest sparcv9 since
> every other OS uses sparc64.  If yes, I'll submit a patch for
> mainline.

That would be fine.


r~

References:
- sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]