This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com> writes:
| On 25 Mar 2003 06:38:33 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net> wrote:
|
| > Yes. However, a linear search is done when looking for nested-types
| > in decl.c:lookup_tag(). Replacing current_binding_level->tags with a
| > hash-table turned out to affect CLASSTYPE_TAGS also since we do some
| > random assignments here and there...
|
| Do we still need to use current_binding_level->tags to find types?
Similarly, we don't need to have two separate bindings,
IDENTIFIER_BINDINGS and IDENTIFIER_NAMESPACE_BINDINGS.
-- Gaby