Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks?

["=?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+LDqutU=?=" <puff at sd dot liteonit dot com dot tw>]

Dear Sir,

I'm really happy to have your reply.
But...Does it really easy to do porting from Tornado 2.2 RS6000 config?
I thought RS6000 and microSPARC were totally different in architechure.

We want to run our application of VxWorks on microSPARC, but now use Tornado
2.0's complier.
But the complier (gcc 2.7.2) lacks lots of C++ support.
We have Tornado 2.2 ,but it doesn't support microSPARC.
Therefore I'd like to port the new gcc for our target.

Is that a hard work that I should not try?  or I can get the advice from
here?

----- Original Message -----
> > I would appreciate if anybody could give me an advice to configure
> > gcc for the target of microSPARC cpu on VxWorks.  My host can be
> > Windows or Linux.
> > Now we're using gcc 2.7.2 for developing embedded system with VxWork
> > and microSPARC, but this version lacks lots of supports for C++
> > programming (like "new" and "try/catch").  It seems that the new
> > release of GCC 3.2.2 only supports VxWorks on PowerPC, and lacks
> > support to microSPARC.  Which would be the closest porting to
> > microSPARC on VxWorks?
> If you are using the version of VxWorks shipped with Tornado 2.2, it
> should be easy to write config/sparc/vxworks.h based on the current
> config/rs6000/vxworks.h.  I will happily answer specific questions.
> We are not interested in supporting earlier, non-ELF, VxWorks in
> modern GCC.
> zw