This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at immd1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, uweigand at de dot ibm dot com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:10:15 -0800
Subject: Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
References: <20030320223021.GJ2006@redhat.com> <200303210115.CAA19377@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:15:36AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Well, but we don't need the size in bits when computing stack
> alignment.

True.  Perhaps you can find out why we're doing this?

> I'll just fix the MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD define to get 128-bit
> libgcc2 routines built.

This is good as well.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

References:
- Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]