This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand


On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:29:56PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I don't understand what they are, but that would explain the
> restrictions against *virtual* registers, not eliminable registers.

Well, given that *_no_elim_operand is only used on pushes, 
I can imagine problems in reload as well.  Indeed, a tiny
bit of effort reveals 

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-02/msg00050.html


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]