This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 15 Mar 2003 16:51:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303151540360.13928-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com> writes:
[...]
| It's the change in behaviour from previous versions that bothers me, and
| this is the reason why I would like something like -fobey-inline as default.
In my opinion, that regression is a reason to really improve the
inlining heuristics, not a reason to add yet another switch.
GCC will get quickly out of control if for each regression we have to
add a switch to paper over the problem.
-- Gaby