This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: rittle at labs dot mot dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:08:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
- References: <200303140943.h2E9hMHR094294@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
> fixincl.o-warn = -Wno-error
Ick. The $(WERROR) should be in $(STRICT_WARN), not
$(GCC_WARN_FLAGS). That way, if you don't support the .-warn syntax,
you'll at least never get the -Werror stuff, rather than just not
getting the overrides.
Richard - you approved it, could you fix it?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01633.html
>
> I will install this patch, if it is ever approved.
It would be better to modify the yacc rules to match what gcc does,
but this patch is OK also. Go ahead and apply it, and if anyone
objects, they can propose the gcc way ;-)
> (3) (all branches since libjava was rolled into the main tree and
> especially since it was made the default for many/most/all platforms:)
>
> GNU make required due to explicit use of GNU make "include file" feature.
Yeah, I don't like this either.