Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

["Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci" <fwyzard-gcc at libero dot it>]

At 18.56 13/03/2003 -0800, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> Those of you who think inlining is guaranteed to be semantically neutral
> might consider this....
>
> #include <setjmp.h>
> static jmp_buf buf;
> inline void x() { setjmp(buf); }
> main() { x(); longjmp(buf); }

Question.

Is the following legal C code ?
It also has different scopes for setjmp() and longjmp(), and it's what I'd 
expect from inlining the above example.

#include <setjmp.h>
static jmp_buf buf;

int main (void) {
  {
    setjmp(buf);
  }
  longjmp(buf);
}