This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple dot com>, Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, Ron Price <ronp at apple dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:48:56 +0000
- Subject: Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:54:05AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > I still think this is a bad idea. Please start thinking about how to
> > produce a better nut cracker rather than a larger sledge hammer.
>
> -fobey-inline is more of a correctness issue than a performance issue
> for the people who need it.
No, it's a compile my buggy program issue.
There is no guarantee in the standard that an "inline" function will be
inlined.
R.