This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*


On 01-Mar-2003, Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Tim Josling wrote:
> 
> > The problem I had in this case was that the system cc didn't like -fstats so
> > it failed. To me, the stdbool only seems to solve part of the problem, which
> > is that suddenly we are building part of the compiler with a wrong compiler.
> > How would this work with C++?
> 
> Both problems should be solved, but the dependency one is intrinsically
> hard to solve.  After all, if you change toplev.c, it should first rebuild
> to stage1 toplev.o with the bootstrap compiler, then relink the stage1
> compiler, then rebuild stage2 and stage3, if the dependencies are properly
> correct.

Isn't that what "make bubblestrap" is for?

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot oz dot au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]