This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree

From: Michael S. Zick <mszick at goquest dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:41:44 -0600
Subject: Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
References: <20030301050932.GA4263@doctormoo> <03030107382302.01209@wolf466> <20030301161108.GA7710@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: mszick at goquest dot com

On Saturday 01 March 2003 10:11 am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:38:23AM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > On Friday 28 February 2003 11:11 pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:09:32AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Build both the current-machine and the cross-machine binutils first.
> > Mike
>
> Eh, that's not reasonable.  For one thing there's no reason gas needs
> to support its host.  For another it's lots of extra building.
Hmm...
Probably better handled by the person doing the building, within
there own build scripts or procedures.
Scratch this suggestion of mine.
Mike

References:
- Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
  - From: Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
  - From: Michael S . Zick
- Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]