This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree


The point of this proposal is that GCC's configure.in has a ludicrous 
number of tests for assembler features which split into two: one if 
there's an actual assembler to test, one if it hasn't been built yet 
(which does hairy version-number examination).

If we required that GAS build before GCC in a unified tree, we could 
eliminate that half of the code, and just use the standard tests on the 
newly built gas.  It would be a great savings in clarity.

What do people think?

--Nathanael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]