This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: snyder <snyder at fnal dot gov>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:25:59 -0800
Subject: Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
References: <20030228110236.30112033.bkoz@redhat.com> <yr8vfz4ul1s.fsf@yaphank-clued0.fnal.gov> <20030228230316.GA25419@redhat.com> <20030228231349.GA29322@nevyn.them.org>

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Should we also persue this for 3.3?  It's not strictly speaking a
> regression, except in that "this worked in stabs" sense.

Dunno.  I think this is up to Mark.


r~

References:
- Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
  - From: snyder
- Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]