Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:46  PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
> > There is a difference between things that "work fine" and things that
> > "are ready".
> Yup.
>
> > What, for example, is the compile time performance on the branch?  
> > SPEC
> > results compared to mainline?  If I correctly interpret Diego's SPEC
> > tester results, it does not quite look like it's there yet.
> Yes, we are not quite there yet.
>
> Since you brought it up, I got curious and gathered a few stats.
> This is how the branch looks today in terms of compile time
> compared with mainline:
>
> - All times are in seconds.
> - All the compilers are built with ENABLE_CHECKING.
> - Bootstrap times are for all default languages (C, C++, Java,
>   Fortran and ObjC).

Is this still without copy propagation, or is that in a tree you used 
here?