This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
- From: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: dnovillo at redhat dot com, amacleod at redhat dot com, jason at redhat dot com,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 21:36:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions
- References: <200302271946.h1RJkURA032086@localhost.redhat.com>
Op do 27-02-2003, om 20:46 schreef law at redhat dot com:
>
>
> Diego/Andrew -- Back when we were in Toronto, we discussed getting rid of
> COMPOUND_EXPRs. Where do we stand on this?
For those who are trying to write a front end that is based on the
tree-ssa work, would you please be more specific about what you mean
with "getting rid of COMPOUND_EXPRs"? Does it mean that GENERIC/GIMPLE
will not use them anymore?
Greetz
Steven