This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Matthew Wilcox <willy at debian dot org>
- Cc: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>,parisc-linux at parisc-linux dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:09:27 +0100
- Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!
- References: <3E5BA2910000087F@ocpmta3.freegates.net><200302261858.h1QIwvSJ019646@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca><20030226203722.A16664@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Matthew Wilcox <willy at debian dot org> writes:
|> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:58:57PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
|> > > Would I have to open a bug report near gcc with this one?
|> >
|> > You mean for the errors:
|> >
|> > joel.c:19: error: initializer element is not constant
|> > joel.c:19: error: (near initialization for `MyRWLock')
|> > joel.c:19: error: initializer element is not constant
|> >
|> > No, fix the code. I don't believe you will win this one. This
|> > feature (extension) was deliberately removed from GCC.
|>
|> I think it was an error to do so. I do not see how
|>
|> (spinlock_t) { 1 }
|>
|> is any more or less constant than
|>
|> { 1 }
A compound literal is not a constant, but an unnamed object.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse dot de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."