This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:50:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: Bug in real.c rewrite
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <20030225230552 dot GD13285 at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson writes:
>Ho hum. There actually _isn't_ a way to indicate signed or unsigned
>during the conversion.
>
>I recall now that this form of overflow is something that Alan Modra
>talked me into at the time. I'm now thinking that this is more trouble
>that it's worth, trying to force a particular result for a value that's
>technically undefined. So I've reverted the change.
>
>
>r~
>
>
> * real.c (real_to_integer2): Force overflow result only for
> unsigned overflow.
Thanks. That fixes the execute/conversion.c and ieee/rbug.c failures
on the tree-ssa branch :-)
jeff