This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Target deprecation, round three

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
Cc: Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu at faw dot uni-ulm dot de>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:21:59 -0800
Subject: Re: Target deprecation, round three
References: <87r89y9qm8.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><1046170660.3777.3299.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.faw.uni-ulm.de><3E5B80E2.10614094@OARcorp.com><1046186893.3776.3330.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.faw.uni-ulm.de><3E5B8CD4.4F14E5D9@OARcorp.com> <87ptpgtbq3.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><3E5BC2B2.EBDFC101@OARcorp.com>

Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com> writes:

>>    sh-*-rtems* # COFF only
>
> No.  Please keep all sh*-*-rtems* targets.  My comment was that the
> SH is the only CPU which I think should still have an alternate object
> format (sh-rtems == COFF, sh-rtemself == ELF).

Right.  I misunderstood you.  I'll leave this one.

zw

References:
- Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Target deprecation, round three
  - From: Joel Sherrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]