This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com, zack at codesourcery dot com, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:08:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?

--On Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:20:31 AM +0100 Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz> wrote:

 Expansion is (to my
understanding) destructive and makes later inlining impossible.

That should not be the case. It was the case with the RTL inliner, but it should not be the case with the tree inliner.

--
Mark Mitchell                mark at codesourcery dot com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]