This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:51:16AM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Toon Moene wrote:-
>
> > Neil Booth wrote:
> >
> > >What I mentioned in the other mail should work. Whatever your original
> > >c-opts.c patch was probably just needs one extra line:
> > >
> > > case OPT_ffixed:
> > >+ result = -1;
> > > break;
> >
> > OK, the following patch works, bootstrapped on
> > powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Is this OK for 3.4 (Neil) and 3.3 (Mark) ?
>
> No it doesn't work, as I explained. You should do what Zack suggested.
Neil,
Actually, if you read Toon's patch, I believe it will work. He didn't
do what you suggested above; he added two new options instead.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
- References:
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.