This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 3.3 target date?



"S. Bosscher" wrote:
> 
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > > Our testing at SuSE showed that 3.3 is in a pretty good shape.
> >
> > That's interesting, because we still have 77 regressions in 3.3 listed
> > in GNATS:
> ---- 8< ----
> > And some 26 regressions in 3.2 (some of which might also apply to 3.3);
> > plus a significant compile-time performance problem.
> 
> Fortunately all of those 26 are either fixed for 3.3 or included in those 77
> open PRs you mentioned.

PR9255 is a regression from 3.2 which prevents m68k targets from
compiling.

Overnight, i386-rtems, sh-rtems, and sh-rtemself wouldn't complete a
build
on the 3.3 branch.  I have updated my tree and am going to see if these
failures were fixed overnight and are repeatable on i386-elf, sh-coff,
and
sh-elf respectively.

> Greetz
> Steven

--joel sherrill


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]