This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- To: Paul Brook <paul at nowt dot org>
- Cc: Toon Moene <moene at knmi dot nl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:03:24 +0000
- Subject: Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.
- References: <3E51F4BE.A59AF664@knmi.nl> <200302182101.56294.paul@nowt.org>
Paul Brook wrote:-
> Apparently not. I thought I'd checked that, but when I try it now it doesn't
> work:(
>
> You could replace '%(cc1_options)' with
> '%(cpp_unique_options) %1 %{m*} %{std*} %{ansi} %{W*&pedantic*} %{w} \
> %{O*} %{undef}'
> (taken from gcc.c, removing -f)
>
> However this stops any -f options getting passed to the propocessor. AFAIK
> cc1 -E doesn't use any -f options anyway. Any -f options it does need could
> of course be added explicitly.
Nope, cc1 -E uses all -f options.
Neil.