This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
On 14-Feb-2003, Fergus Henderson <email@example.com.OZ.AU> wrote:
> In GCC trees the signedness of additions is determined by the signedness
> of the types of the operands. Representing +wrap additions as unsigned
> operations would require that the operations be converted to unsigned
Sorry, I meant s/the operations/the operands/
Fergus Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.