This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics

From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:31:38 +1100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
References: <20030213190720.E9620F2D5E@nile.gnat.com> <20030214072040.GB16020@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au>

On 14-Feb-2003, Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> In GCC trees the signedness of additions is determined by the signedness
> of the types of the operands.  Representing +wrap additions as unsigned
> operations would require that the operations be converted to unsigned
> types.

Sorry, I meant s/the operations/the operands/

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
  - From: Michael S. Zick

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]