This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: vrp?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:59:45 -0800
Subject: Re: vrp?
References: <20030211225855.A3544@redhat.com> <200302121428.h1CESDGe011256@localhost.redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 07:28:12AM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Of course there were also the compile-time
> issues since I my recollection was that it was a traditional iterate
> iterate iterate until you reach a fixed point solution.  

Blah.  I'm not interested in replacing one compile time problem
with another.

At the moment I'm bootstrapping to find out how exactly how much
compile time I'm going to save by removing the cse code.  That'll
give me some idea if this is worth persuing at all for 3.4.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vrp?
  - From: law
- Re: vrp?
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- vrp?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: vrp?
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]